RED BERYL MARKETING SYSTEMS AUDIT — SAMPLE REPORT
Meridian Diamond Co. · Local Search Intelligence (sample, anonymized) Compiled 4 Sep 2026

Competitive Position, 11 Markets

Every named local competitor tracked against a Meridian Diamond Co. store, consolidated into one file: who they are, how their review profile compares, how much local demand they are estimated to absorb, and which search categories Meridian is losing in each market.

Reporting period
15 Jul – 15 Aug 2026
Locations
11 of 11
Geo-grid scans
97 store × keyword
Named competitors
10 unique
Source
Google Business Profile scan
Read the deltas with care. This is a single 30-day window with no year-over-year baseline, and August is a softer jewelry month than July. Rank and placement movement here is a diagnostic signal, not a verdict on performance. Sarasota’s scan runs 27 Jul – 26 Aug, eleven days offset from the rest.

The portfolio at a glance

Estimated monthly lead volume each named competitor pulls from its local market.

Where the pressure is

Estimated monthly local leads captured by the named competitor in each market. Two markets carry more than half the portfolio’s total competitive pressure.

Competitor lead pressure by market
Estimated leads per month · named competitor only
019,00038,000 leads / mo

The review moat

Google review count is the most durable local-pack asset a store owns. Meridian leads on volume in 8 of 11 markets — the three exceptions are the markets to watch.

Total Google reviews: Meridian store vs named competitor
Bars are review counts; the number after each pair is the store’s star rating against the competitor’s
Meridian store Named competitor
01,0002,000 reviews

What Meridian owns and what it cedes

All 97 keyword scans grouped by category. The pattern is consistent in every market: bridal is won, service and gold-buying are not.

Average top-3 local-pack placement by keyword category
Share of grid points where the store appears in the top 3 · average across all markets scanning that category
0%50%100% of grid

Master table

Click any column header to sort. Rank is the average local-pack position across that store’s tracked keywords — lower is better.

Market ▲▼ Named competitor ▲▼ Leads/mo ▲▼ Pressure ▲▼ Comp reviews ▲▼ Meridian reviews ▲▼ Review gap ▲▼ Rating Δ ▲▼ Avg rank ▲▼ Rank Δ ▲▼

Market dossiers

Ordered by competitive pressure. Keyword rows show current average rank and the change in top-3 placement against the prior scan.

What the eleven markets say together

Patterns that only appear once every store’s competitor set sits in one file.

AI assistant visibility

Across all 97 store × keyword scans, which assistants named a Meridian store in their local answer.

Three assistants return Meridian zero times out of 97. Claude, Perplexity and Grok surface no Meridian location for any tracked term in any market. Gemini, the strongest, still only names Meridian in just over half of scans. Every named competitor has the same opportunity open to them, and none of them has taken it yet either.

Where to spend the next 90 days

Drawn from the competitive gaps above, ordered by leverage against effort.

Sample report for Meridian Diamond Co. (a stand-in name for this demo). Review statistics from synced Google reviews. Competitor lead estimates are modelled figures from Red Beryl’s local-search scan. 04.09.2026